October 13
At one point, I could not think past classroom management problems and learning student names. As I reflect now, I can appreciate how, early in my teaching career, I was reminded that I am at the bottom of a very extensive hierarchy. In Education class, the readings and discussions illuminate just how entrenched school policy-making is, starting from the state government and filtering down to school boards and superintendents, finally, to me. In my case, I am expected to teach a curriculum that someone above me in the hierarchy decided was best for high school English students.
I know very little about the school board that affects my district. I do not know who wrote the scripted curriculum for my 9th and 12th graders. But according to one of my readings
(Provenzo 2002), school boards tend to be relatively conservative, “reflecting the status quo and the power blocks in their communities.” Then I am inherently skeptical about the curriculum I received. The 9th grade expository unit is based on the book A Night To Remember – a non-fiction account of the final hours before the Titanic sank. The author Walter Lord interviewed hundreds of people to get multiple perspectives. Of the over two hundred people that Lord names in excruciating detail, not one character is a minority. Not one character is someone my students can remotely relate to. My students do not reflect the “status quo.”
I agree that the fast pace of technology growth and the racial diversity of our students make dealing with difference and change imperative for teachers. Nevertheless, scripted curriculum seems to say that teachers need not worry about difference or change. Here, marginalized to a 2-inch binder with unit tabs, is a curriculum that will satisfy all the needs of every student. Teach this exactly and watch their scores rise, they seem to say.
A month into teaching I went back to
No comments:
Post a Comment